In Re: James Lee Henderson’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Atkins v. Virginia · In re Morris · In Re: Marvin Lee Wilson · In Re: Robert Madrid Salazar, Movant · In Re: Yokamon Laneal Hearn
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'leave it for the district court to decide whether [a petitioner's] case presents the ‘rare and exceptional circumstances’ that would entitle him to the benefit of equitable tolling.’ ” In re Mathis, 483 F.3d 395, 400 (5th Cir.2007) (quoting In re Henderson, 462 F.3d at 417 ). 11 . See also Coleman v, Johnson, 184 F.3d 398, 402 (5th Cir. 1999) (”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a sufficient showing of possible merit to warrant a fuller [exploration] by the district court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.