Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 462 F.3d 521 - Rawe

Rawe’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

64
cited by 64 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
October 2024
most recently cited

4 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 64 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2024 · most notably Coomer v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (2010), Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt (2016)

4 district · 4 state decisions

440200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Migra v. Warren City School District Board of Education · Salve Regina College v. Russell · Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Moitie · Lyndell Mitchell v. The City of Moore Oklahoma Mike Drea Bruce Storm Gary Tipps

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 64 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'[R]es judicata has four elements: (1) a final decision on the merits by a court of competent jurisdiction; (2) a subsequent action between the same parties or their privies; (3) an issue in the subsequent action which was litigated or which should have been litigated in the prior action; and (4) an identity of the causes of action.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “[R]es judicata does not apply to claims that were not ripe at the time of the first suit.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “(1) the insurer must be obligated to pay the claim under the terms of the policy; (2) the insurer must lack a reasonable basis in law or, fact for denying the claim; and (3) it must be shown that the insurer either knew there was no reasonable basis for denying the claim or acted with reckless disregard for whether such a basis existed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.