462 F. Supp. 630 - Schimizzi v. Chrysler Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 35 U.S.C. § 102 · 35 U.S.C. § 103 · 35 U.S.C. § 112 · 35 U.S.C. § 282
Relies on Graham v. John Deere Company of Kansas City Calmar Inc · Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. · Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp. · Anderson's-Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Salvage Co. · Sakraida v. Ag Pro, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . trial and success, at least where the same solution has been independently reached by a number of others almost immediately after the problem arose, (may) be the best evidence of obviousness.” Schimizzi v. Chrysler Corporation, 462 F.Supp. 630, at p. 639 (S.D.N.Y.1978).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.