People v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently April 2020 · most notably 200 F. App'x 463 - McKissic v. Birkett (2006), People v. Pipes (2006)
2 federal appellate · 44 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`[W]aiver is the "intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“`One who waives his rights under a rule may not then seek appellate review of a claimed deprivation of those rights, for his waiver has extinguished any error.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Counsel may not harbor error as an appellate parachute.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.