Reese v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
April 1981
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““1. Prior to any in-custody police questioning the accused must be warned in clear and unequivocal terms, (1) that he has a right to remain silent; (2) that any statements that he does make may be used as evidence against him; (3) that he has a right to consult with, and have present, prior to, and during interrogation, an attorney either retained or appointed; and, (4) that if he cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for him prior to any questioning, if he so desires. 2. Each of these four warnings must be given and it is not sufficient to give some, but not all, of the warnings. The result of any questioning which is not in compliance with these requirements would be inadmissible in a trial.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Gray v. State · Breedlove v. State““A. We advised him that he had a right to remain silent. ‡ ‡ ⅛ ‡ ‡ ‡ Q. Anything else ? A. And anything that he said could be used against him in a court of law and that he had a right to an attorney and if he couldn’t afford one, one would be appointed for him by the law. Q. Did you tell him where one would be appointed for him ? A. No sir. Q. Did you tell him where an attorney could be obtained, if he wanted one then ? A. No sir. Q. Did you tell him anything about him having an attorney before he talked to you ? A. Before he talked to me ? Q. Yes. A. I told him that he had a right to an attorney. Q. You didn’t tell him how he could get one A. No sir.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Gray v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.