Green v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably Malvo Ex Rel. Malvo v. J. C. Penney Co. (1973), State v. Erickson (1978)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1861 (Jury Selection and Service Act of 1968) · 28 U.S.C. § 1863
Relies on Glasser v. United States · Rochin v. People of California · V The Board of Higher Education of the City of New York · Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co. · Smith v. Texas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]t is a general rule in the interpretation of statutes that provisions of an original act which are repeated in an amendment are considered as a continuation of the original act. Such provisions are construed not as imposing a new requirement, but merely as continuing the original one, unless a contrary legislative intent is indicated.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Fyfe · Tuckfield v. State“No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The term ‘due process of law’ is not susceptible of precise definition or reduction to a mathematical formula. But in the course of judicial decisions it has come to express a basic concept of justice under law, such as ‘our traditional conception of fair play and substantial justice’ the ‘protection of the individual from arbitrary action’, ‘fundamental principles of liberty and justice’, whether there has been a ‘[denial of] fundamental fairness, shocking to the universal sense of justice’, ‘that whole community sense of “decency and fairness” that has been woven by common experience into the fabric of acceptable conduct’, and a ‘respect for those personal immunities which * * * are “so rooted in the traditions and conscience of our people as to be ranked as fundamental”, * * * or are “implicit in the concept of ordered liberty.” ’ (Citations omitted.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Bachner v. Pearson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.