Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 462 Pa. 438 - Commonwealth v. McNeill

Commonwealth v. McNeill’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
July 1996
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently July 1996

15 state decisions

90197519801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Myma · Commonwealth v. Matthews · Commonwealth v. Hoffman · Commonwealth v. Archambault · Commonwealth v. Bailey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he judge occupies an exalted and dignified position; he is the one person to whom the jury, with rare exceptions, looks for guidance, and from whom the litigants expect absolute impartiality. An expression indicative of favor or condemnation is quickly reflected in the jury box . . . . To depart from the clear line of duty through questions, expressions or conduct, contravenes the orderly administration of justice. It has a tendency to take from one of the parties the right to a fair and impartial trial, as guaranteed under our system of jurisprudence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a trial judge may not suggest a verdict of guilty or not guilty nor directly express an opinion on the guilt or innocence of the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “cautioning instructions . . . that the jury is the final arbiter of the verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.