Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 462 Pa. 474 - Specter v. Commonwealth

Specter v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

112
cited by 112 later decisions
3
states following
July 2019
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 1 district · 90 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 112 later decisions — most recently July 2019 · most notably Carter v. City of Philadelphia (1999), Blake v. Kline (1979)

10 federal appellate · 1 district · 90 state decisions

54019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ayala v. Philadelphia Board of Public Education · Federal Trade Commission v. Broch · Flagiello v. Pennsylvania Hospital · Falco v. PADOS · BROWN v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 112 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is, of course, no doubt that the Commonwealth itself could have constructed the Turnpike in the same manner that it constructs and operates its State highways. Had it done so, the State’s immunity from suit would encompass actions arising in connection with the Turnpike. But the Commonwealth itself did not build this highway and does not maintain it. The legislature created this separate body and at the same time disclaimed any responsibility on the part of the Commonwealth for liabilities which it, the Commission, might incur. It is clear that the Commission is not an integral part of the Commonwealth, and cannot share the attributes of sovereignty which inhere in the state. It follows that the Commission is not immune from suit in tort for the acts of its servants and agents acting in the course of their employment or agency.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Article I, Section 11, of the Constitution of Pennsylvania, P.S., provides in part that ‘suits may be brought against the Commonwealth in such manner, in such courts and in such cases as the Legislature may by law direct.’ This Court has repeatedly and recently construed the quoted language as imposing a constitutional bar to suits against the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and as leaving it to the legislature to determine how and when this bar shall be lifted. As we said in Brown v. Commonwealth, 453 Pa. 566, 572 , 305 A.2d 868, 871 (1973), ‘ [w] hether the doctrine of sovereign immunity should be modified in this Commonwealth is a legislative question. We could not base a contrary holding upon our impatience with the Legislature’s failure to act as speedily and comprehensively as we believe it should. ’ We remain of this opinion, founded as it is in the conviction that the bar to suit absent legislative direction to the contrary is constitutionally mandated. The legislature having chosen to maintain the immunity of the sovereign as to suits of this character, the action against the Commonwealth may not be maintained, and the trial court was correct in sustaining the preliminary objections and dismissing the complaint as to the Commonwealth. (Footnote omitted.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “While [the legislature] provided for close connection between the Commission and the Commonwealth, and particularly the Department of Highways, the legislature has also made a clear distinction between the Commission and the Commonwealth, particularly with regard to financial matters. The statutory scheme was obviously designed to provide for the construction and maintenance of the Turnpike, but explicitly without the assumption by the Commonwealth of any liability or responsibility in connection therewith.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.