Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 462 So. 2d 1178 - Kumar Corp. v. Nopal Lines, Ltd.

462 So. 2d 1178 - Kumar Corp. v. Nopal Lines, Ltd.’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
3
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently April 2015 · most notably New Jersey Citizen Action v. Riviera Motel Corp. (1997), 965 So. 2d 151 - Mortgage Electronic Registration v. Azize (2007)

1 federal appellate · 1 district · 26 state decisions

901985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. Camp · Sierra Club v. Morton · 402 So. 2d 606 - State v. Hawkins · 451 So. 2d 844 - State v. Hogan · Mize v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Every action may be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest, but a personal representative, administrator, guardian, trustee of an express trust, a party with whom or in whose name a contract has been made for the benefit of another, or a party expressly authorized by statute may sue in that person’s own name without joining the party for whose benefit the action is brought.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “The Florida real party in interest rule, Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.210(a), permits an action to be prosecuted in the name of someone other than, but acting for, the real party in interest.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “put the goods into the possession of a carrier at the port for shipment and obtain a negotiable bill or bills of lading covering the entire transportation to the named destination”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.