462 So. 2d 1196 - Barrack v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
Relationships
Relies on 450 So. 2d 1114 - Dania Jai-Alai Palace, Inc. v. Sykes · 457 So. 2d 1012 - Copeland v. State · Miller v. Miller · 421 So. 2d 728 - Vantage View, Inc. v. Bali East Development Corp. · Aztec Motel, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Faircloth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It might have been simpler and more to the point for the legislature to merely restrict use by a developer of any such purchase funds, as opposed to specifying the type of escrow accounts that should be utilized; however, we can understand that the enacting body foresaw payment into the specified escrow accounts as a key to all else that is required by the section. We are mindful that the subject law places no specific controls over the escrow agent or agency receiving the funds, however, we do not perceive this as a defect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.