¶1In re Latter & Blum, Inc., applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 84-CA-96; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 269-246.
¶2Prior report: 462 So.2d 229.
¶3Granted.
462 So. 2d 1255
Decided February 4, 1985
Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 1985-02-04
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently August 1993
3 state decisions
Relies on Caplan v. Latter & Blum, Inc.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1985-02-04
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1In re Latter & Blum, Inc., applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 84-CA-96; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. “C”, No. 269-246.
¶2Prior report: 462 So.2d 229.
¶3Granted.