462 So. 2d 446 - Duest v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
72 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 75 later decisions — most recently March 2016 · most notably 555 So. 2d 849 - Duest v. Dugger (1990), 855 So. 2d 33 - Duest v. State (2003)
72 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 246 So. 2d 771 - Richardson v. State · Tison v. Arizona · McCormick v. Texas · 417 So. 2d 639 - Ferguson v. State · Doe v. Delaware
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the error committed was so prejudicial as to vitiate the entire trial.”
15 later decisions quote this exact passage“On February 15, 1982, defendant was seen by witnesses carrying a knife in the waistband of his pants. Subsequently, he told a witness that he was going to a gay bar to "roll a fag." Defendant was later seen at a predominantly gay bar with John Pope, the victim. The two of them then left the bar in Pope's gold Camaro. Several hours later, Pope's roommate returned home and found the house unlocked, the lights on, the stereo on loud, and blood on the bed. The sheriff was contacted. Upon arrival, the deputy sheriff found Pope on the bathroom floor in a pool of blood with multiple stab wounds. Defendant was found and arrested on April 18, 1982.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“The proper procedure to take when objectionable comments are made is to object and request an instruction from the court that the jury disregard the remarks.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.