Bighames v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 443 So. 2d 1371 - Holsemback v. State · 440 So. 2d 1231 - Bighames v. State · 401 So. 2d 123 - Bracewell v. State · 424 So. 2d 669 - Haynes v. State · 428 So. 2d 148 - Robinson v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[m]atters which are jurisdictional or substantive in nature are governed by the law applicable at the time of the offense absent a clear expression in the statute or rule to the contrary.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.