462 So. 2d 849 - Royal v. Parado’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably 502 So. 2d 484 - Publix Super Markets v. Cheesbro Roofing (1987), 684 So. 2d 181 - Ruth v. Department of Legal Affairs (1996)
1 federal appellate · 27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 360 So. 2d 68 - Randle-Eastern Ambulance Service v. Vasta · Georgia Casualty Co. v. O'Donnell · Lakeland Ideal Farm & Drainage District v. Mitchell · Collins, Et Ux. v. McKelvain · Circle Finance Co. v. Peacock
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[C]ourts of equity having jurisdiction of the person of a party have exercised the power to compel him to perform a contract, execute a trust, or undo the effects of a fraud, notwithstanding it may relate to or incidentally affect the title to land in another jurisdiction.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“a condition precedent to the granting of the remedy of rescission is that the other party be returned to his status quo. Generally, a contract will not be rescinded even for fraud when it is not possible for the opposing party to be put back into his pre-agreement status quo condition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“a court of equity will ordinarily rescind or cancel an instrument only for fraud, accident or mistake and not because of the mere want or failure of consideration.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.