Lococo v. Lococo’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently April 2009
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 359 So. 2d 154 - Welch v. Crown Zellerbach Corp. · 340 So. 2d 287 - Mitchell v. Bertolla · 289 So. 2d 129 - Barnett v. Develle · 362 So. 2d 758 - Sewell v. Argonaut Southwest Ins. Co. · 370 So. 2d 659 - Rasbury v. Baudier
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any serious deterioration of the properties under his management, absent a sufficient explanation of the causation thereof, indicates a breach of that fiduciary duty. Thus, the defendant would have to account to and compensate the plaintiff for losses or damages incurred due to his mismanagement or negligence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“If C.C. Art. 2369 is to have any application to this case, it must be presumed that its authors intended for a spouse having control of community property at the termination of a community property regime to occupy the position of a coowner under the general law of property.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[w]e do not believe that C.C. Art. 2369 has any application in this case, nor ... have we been able to determine exactly in what situation C.C. Art. 2369 applies.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.