462 So. 2d 953 - Ex Parte Troha’s Empirical Analysis
1984
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 41 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently February 2017 · most notably McNair v. Campbell (2005), 32 Cal. 4th 269 - People v. Danks (2004)
2 federal appellate · 41 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Roan v. State · 39 Ala. App. 501 - Smith v. State · Blake v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The test of vitiating influence is not that it did influence a member of the jury to act without the evidence, but that it might have unlawfully influenced that juror and others with whom he deliberated, and might have unlawfully influenced its verdict rendered.”
11 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Maddox v. State · McNair v. State“guidance and scripture references so as to enable me to make a proper and just decision.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Maddox v. State“might have unlawfully influenced the jury's verdict.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.