Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 462 So. 2d 964 - Stokes v. State

462 So. 2d 964 - Stokes v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 2018

11 state decisions

501984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Donnelly v. DeChristoforo · 370 So. 2d 1119 - Alderson v. State · 370 So. 2d 1115 - Nix v. State · 363 So. 2d 109 - Diamond v. State · Hill v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"`[T]he outcome of another's prosecution is simply irrelevant to the guilt or innocence of the defendant and may not be received as substantive evidence at defendant's trial. See, e.g., Hill v. State, 210 Ala. 221 , 97 So. 639 (1923).'"”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “cured by the trial court's admonition to the jury to disregard the prosecutor's comment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.