Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 462 SO2D 981 - Phillips v. State

Phillips v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently December 2015 · most notably 808 So. 2d 1148 - Taylor v. State (2000), 725 So. 2d 1003 - Price v. State (1997)

28 state decisions

1201984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Gideon v. Wainwright · Neil v. Biggers · Manson v. Brathwaite · Burgett v. Texas

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “reasonable investigation of irregularities claimed to have been committed”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"(1) the opportunity of the witness to view the criminal at the time of the crime; (2) the witness's degree of attention; (3) the accuracy of his prior description of the criminal; (4) the level of certainty demonstrated at the identification; and (5) the time between the crime and the identification."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “`Where a weak link in the chain of custody is said to exist, it presents a question of the credit and weight to be accorded rather than ... the admissibility of the item.' Williams v. State, 375 So.2d 1257, 1267 (Ala.Cr.App.), cert. denied, 375 So.2d 1271 (Ala.1979).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.