Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 462 U.S. 637 - Florida v. Casal

Florida v. Casal’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

95
cited by 95 later decisions
5
cited 5 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
May 2006
most recently cited

21 federal appellate · 5 district · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 95 later decisions (5 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2006 · most notably Batson v. Kentucky (1986), Michigan v. Long (1983)

21 federal appellate · 5 district · 14 state decisions

480198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Villamonte-Marquez · State v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 95 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"With our dual system of state and federal laws, administered by parallel state and federal courts, different standards may arise in different areas. But when state courts interpret state law to require more than the Federal Constitution requires, the citizens of the state must be aware that they have the power to amend state law to ensure rational law enforcement. The people of Florida have now done so with respect to Art. 1, § 12 of the State Constitution; they have it within their power to do so with respect to Florida Statute § 327.56 [the statute involved that was interpreted by the Florida Supreme Court contrary to what the Chief Justice believed its interpretation should be.]." Florida v. Casal, supra, at ___, 103 S.Ct. at 3101-02 (Burger, J., concurring) (Emphasis added.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.