Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 463 A2D 1333 - State v. Lambert

State v. Lambert’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
May 2009
most recently cited

18 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 2009

18 state decisions

120198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Neil v. Biggers · Manson v. Brathwaite · State v. Henderson · State v. Porraro · State v. Howard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““in order to come within the reach of our kidnapping statute, * * * any confinement or imprisonment must have some independent significance, and thus any movement of a victim during the course of a crime cannot be punished as kidnapping unless such movement exceeds that necessary to facilitate the crime at hand.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.