Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 463 A.2d 633 - Key v. State

Key v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
4
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently January 2017

14 state decisions

601983199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Duncan v. State of Louisiana · Gardner v. Florida · Klopfer v. State of North Carolina · Spencer v. State of Texas a Bell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “reasonable notice of the State’s intent to seek additional punishment, be present with counsel, have an opportunity to be heard, be confronted with witnesses against him [or her], have the right to cross-examine, and to offer evidence of his own.” Key v. State, 463 A.2d 633, 639 (Del.1983) (quoting Specht v. Patterson, 386 U.S. 605, 610 , 87 S.Ct. 1209 , 18 L.Ed.2d 326 (1967)). 27 . Bailey v. State, 450 A.2d at 405 (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Individually, none of these factors is conclusive; they are related .. ..”). 21 . Barker, 407 U.S. at 533 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 . 22 . United States v. Marion, 404 U.S. 307, 320 , 92 S.Ct. 455 , 30 L.Ed.2d 468 (1971) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““In all criminal prosecutions, the accused hath a right ... to have ... a speedy and public trial ...””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.