Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 463 A2D 779 - State v. Pineau

State v. Pineau’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
August 2007
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 2007

10 state decisions

40198319902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Reilly · State v. Wyman · State v. Smith · State v. Martel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The prosecutor should refrain from argument which would divert the jury from its duty to decide the case on the evidence, by injecting issues broader that the guilt or innocence of the accused under the controlling law ....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.