King v. Rogers’s Empirical Analysis
463 F.2d 1188 · 1972
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently September 1993
7 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1481 (§ 349 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez · Trop v. Dulles · Afroyim v. Rusk · Savorgnan v. United States · Nishikawa v. Dulles
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“affirmative voluntary act(s) clearly manifesting a decision to accept (foreign) nationality ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Terrazas v. Haig
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.