Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 463 F.2d 187 - United States v. Mitchell

United States v. Mitchell’s Empirical Analysis

463 F.2d 187 · 1972

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
1
states following
February 2005
most recently cited

48 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently February 2005 · most notably United States v. Brown (1976), United States v. Williams (1979)

48 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

4101972198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 871 (Presidential Threat Protection Act of 2000)

Relies on Morissette v. United States · Watts v. United States · Street v. New York · First National Bank v. Dickinson · Lewis v. Martin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) Whoever in any way or degree obstructs, delays, or affects commerce or the movement of any article or commodity in commerce, by robbery or extortion or attempts or conspires so to do, or commits or threatens physical violence to any person or property in furtherance of a plan or purpose to do anything in violation of this section shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both. p-q * * * (2) The term “extortion” means the obtaining of property from another, with his consent, induced by wrongful use of actual or threatened force, violence, or fear, or under color of official right. (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.