Wiseman v. Reposa’s Empirical Analysis
463 F.2d 226 · 1972
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 2023
13 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Alford v. United States · Kunglig Jarnvagsstyrelsen v. Dexter & Carpenter, Inc. · Raulie v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“not to permit defendant to explore, through the plaintiff, why his original complaint alleged an accident on one date and a substitute complaint on another.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“As a matter of pleading the original complaint had disappeared. As an admission against interest, it had not.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.