Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

463 F.2d 246

Docket No. 71-3051.

Willis v. Caldwell

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1972-06-26

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1972

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Townsend v. Sain

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1972-06-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Fifth Circuit.

Marshall R. Wood, Savannah, Ga. (Court Appointed), Falligant, Doremus & Karsman, Savannah, Ga., for petitioner-appellant.

Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen. of Ga., W. Hensell Harris, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Harold N. Hill, Jr., Executive Asst. Atty. Gen., Courtney Wilder Stanton, Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for respondent-appellee.

Before WISDOM and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges, and BOOTLE, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

James Willis appeals from the dismissal by the district of his petition for habeas corpus relief. We vacate the district court's order of dismissal and remand the case for an evidentiary hearing on the allegations contained in Willis's petition. Townsend v. Sain, 1963, 372 U.S. 293, 83 S.Ct. 745, 9 L.Ed.2d 770; 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254(d).

¶2

Willis alleges (1) that he was denied effective assistance of counsel at his state criminal trial in 1936 and (2) that members of his race were systematically excluded from the grand and petit juries that indicted and convicted him. Because of the nature of these allegations and the apparent inability of the petitioner to prepare or try this cause, we suggest that the district court consider the appointment of counsel for Willis.

¶3

Vacated and remanded.

/463/f2d/246 · .json · Public domain