Carpenter v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
463 F.2d 397 · 1972
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 3 district · 8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2010 · most notably Carpenter v. United States (1972), United States v. Gunter (1976)
16 federal appellate · 3 district · 8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3500
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Wong Sun v. United States · Bruton v. United States · United States v. Wade · Simmons v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(i)n addition, and we believe importantly, Carpenter’s name was never mentioned by Morris in his admission. He was not, accordingly, subjected to a powerfully incriminating extrajudicial statement with which the defendant was confronted in Bruton. Id. at 399.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“"The trial court has discretion in determining the limits of cross-examination and his discretion will not be disturbed unless clearly prejudicial. [Citing cases.] ..."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Nimmo v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.