Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 463 F.2d 44 - United States v. McBride

United States v. McBride’s Empirical Analysis

463 F.2d 44 · 1972

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
March 1985
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 659

Relies on Jones v. United States · Jackson v. Denno · Lego v. Twomey · United States v. Harris · Mattox v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In our opinion it is the duty of a trial court to grant a new trial, where a witness at the original trial subsequently admits on oath that he committed perjury, or even that he was mistaken in his testimony, provided such testimony related to a material issue, and was not cumulative.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.