United States v. Glick’s Empirical Analysis
463 F.2d 491 · 1972
Citation profile
38 federal appellate · 4 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 67 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently October 2018 · most notably Rogers v. United States (1975), United States v. Dellinger (1972)
38 federal appellate · 4 district · 11 state decisions — followed in 10 states
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 13 (Assimilative Crimes Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 1361 · 18 U.S.C. § 2071 · 50 U.S.C. § 3811
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Kotteakos v. United States · Frey v. United States · Beck v. United States · Shields v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The fact that the jury, which had been deliberating for almost two hours without reaching a verdict, returned a verdict of “guilty with extreme mercy” within five minutes “after being told unconditionally and unequivocally that it could recommend leniency,” strongly suggests that the trial judge’s response may have induced unanimity by giving members of the jury who had previously hesitated about reaching a guilty verdict the impression that the recommendation might be an acceptable compromise.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“private communications between the judge and jury violate[ ] the unequivocal mandate of Rule 43.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“shall be present ... at every stage of the trial.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.