Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

463 F.2d 773

Docket No. 72-1731 Summary Calendar.*

Hill v. Richardson

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

July 25, 1972.

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1972-07-25

2 counsel of record

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 371

Relies on Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York · Allen v. United States · United States v. Fioravanti

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1972-07-25

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently October 2014 · most notably United States v. Ramirez (1988), United States v. See (1974)

21 federal appellate · 5 state decisions

14019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Fifth Circuit.

Stan Carter, Wichita Falls, Tex., Nelson, Sherrod, Carter & Oldham, Wichita Falls, Tex., for plaintiff-appellant.

Eldon B. Mahon, U. S. Atty., William L. Johnson, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., Fort Worth, Tex., for defendant-appellee.

Before THORNBERRY, COLEMAN and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

The District Court affirmed the administrative decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare that Juriel A. Hill was not entitled to disability benefits under Secs. 216 and 223 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C., Secs. 416, 423.

¶2

This is a close case on the facts. Even so, there is substantial evidence in the record as a whole to support the determination of the Secretary. Therefore, his findings are conclusive and may not be disturbed on appeal, Social Security Act, Sec. 205(g), 42 U.S.C., Sec. 405(g).

¶3

Affirmed.

/463/f2d/773 · .json · Public domain