Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 463 F.2d 84 - United States ex rel. Curtis v. Warden of Green Haven Prison

United States ex rel. Curtis v. Warden of Green Haven Prison’s Empirical Analysis

463 F.2d 84 · 1972

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
September 2018
most recently cited

9 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently September 2018

9 federal appellate · 2 state decisions

12019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on United States v. Wade · Kirby v. Illinois · Picard v. Connor · Oyler v. Boles · Snowden v. Hughes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The indictments, although the defendant is misnamed therein, are no less valid indictments, under paragraph 9, article 1, of the amendments to the constitution of this State. [Art. 1, par. 7 of the 1947 Constitution], which provides that ‘no person shall be held to answer for a criminal offense unless on the presentment or indictment of the grand jury.’ [at 700].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Q. Do you know his name? A. First name only, Henry. Q. Have you as of yet learned the identity [sic] of his last name? A. No sir I haven’t. Q. Not as of today? A. No sir.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the substance of a federal habeas corpus claim must first be presented to the state courts”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.