Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 463 F.2d 894 - Thomas W. Sanders v. John L. McClellan

Thomas W. Sanders v. John L. McClellan’s Empirical Analysis

463 F.2d 894 · 1972

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
May 2017
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently May 2017

6 federal appellate · 2 district · 3 state decisions

12019721980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2283

Relies on Younger v. Harris · Baker v. Carr · United States v. O'Brien · Cantwell v. State of Connecticut · Roth v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the judiciary has the duty 'of not lightly interfering with Congress' exercise of its legitimate powers.' Hutcheson v. United States, 369 U.S. at 622, 82 S.Ct. at 1017. We recently discussed this duty at some length in Ansara v. Eastland, supra.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “A witness may address his claims to the Subcommittee, which may sustain objections. Were the Subcommittee to insist, however, upon some response beyond the witness’ conception of his obligation, and he refused to comply, no punitive action could be taken against him unless the full Committee obtained from the Senate as a whole a citation of the witness for contempt, the citation had been referred to the United States Attorney, and an indictment returned or information filed. Should prosecution occur, the witness’ claims could then be raised before the trial court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “the impossibility of a court's undertaking independent resolution without expressing lack of the respect due coordinate branches of the government”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.