Padilla v. Lever’s Empirical Analysis
463 F.3d 1046 · 2006
Citation profile
8 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1973 (§ 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965) · 42 U.S.C. § 1973A (§ 3 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965) · 42 U.S.C. § 1973C (§ 5 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965)
Relies on Roe v. Wade · Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp. · Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co. · Southern Pacific Terminal Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission · Morales v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“`Evading review' for the purpose of the exception need not mean that review is impossible. It only means that in the ordinary course of affairs it is very likely to escape review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[e]lection cases often fall within this exception, because the inherently brief duration of an election is almost invariably too short to enable full litigation on the merits.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“capable of repetition, yet evading review.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.