Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 463 F.3d 1064 - In re Incomnet, Inc.

In re Incomnet, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
June 2025
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2025 · most notably Bear, Stearns Securities Corp. v. Gredd (In Re Manhattan Investment Fund Ltd.) (2007), Leonard v. Coolidge (In Re National Audit Defense Network) (2007)

2 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions

250200620102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bonded Financial Services, Inc. v. European American Bank · Nordberg v. Societe Generale · Danning v. Miller · Ucc v. Baker & Getty Financial Services Inc First National Bank of Barnesville · Texas Office of Public Utility Counsel v. Federal Communications Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a transferee is one who ... has dominion over the money or other asset,”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “has sufficient authority over the funds to direct their disbursement.” Id. Thus, the Capital LP qualified as a “transferee” when it received the Michael Reese Transfers and the authority to use those funds pursuant to the Loan Agreement, whereas Galen Healthcare, Inc. another subsidiary of HCA, was not a”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[a] number of circuits combined these tests — or at least combined their names — creating a ‘dominion and control test’ to determine whether a party is an initial transferee.” 463 F.3d at 1071 . In a slight variation, the Eleventh Circuit applies the”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.