Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 463 F.3d 641 - Shapo v. Engle

Shapo v. Engle’s Empirical Analysis

463 F.3d 641 · 2006

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
June 2018
most recently cited

8 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America · Peacock v. Thomas · Staton v. Boeing Co. · Smyth ex rel. Smyth v. Rivero · United States v. City of Chicago

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a district judge cannot dismiss a suit with prejudice, thus terminating federal jurisdiction, yet at the same time retain jurisdiction to enforce the parties' settlement that led to the dismissal with prejudice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.