Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 463 F.3d 838 - Freitag v. Ayers

Freitag v. Ayers’s Empirical Analysis

463 F.3d 838 · 2006

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
August 2012
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Appellate journey

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1985

Relies on McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green · Texas Department of Community Affairs v. Burdine · Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Connick v. Myers · Faragher v. City of Boca Raton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “her. Freitag completed a 128 Form detailing the incident and attempted to discipline Inmate Z with ten days of escort status, which was approved by a supervising captain. However, Lieutenant David Carmichael discarded the 128 Form and informed Freitag that she could not place Inmate Z on escort status, explaining to her that she was the only officer who had a problem with Inmate Z, and that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “supervisors and top administrative staff at Pelican Bay have not responded appropriately to complaints about inmates directing exhibitionist masturbation toward female staff members and have made little effort to take advantage of the options available to control exhibitionist masturbation behavior”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “the inability of the defendants to grasp the mandate of Title VII, particularly in light of the clear language of 29 C.F.R. 1604.11, [ ] did not give them carte blanche to retaliate against [her] just because she evidently understood the law better than they did.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.