Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

463 F. App'x 176

In re Abebe

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided February 2, 2012

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2012-02-02

Decided 2012-02-02

¶1Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Unula Boo Shawn Abebe petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion for a temporary restraining order and injunction. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for-ma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We also deny Abebe’s pending motion for emergency relief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4 PETITION DENIED.

/463/fappx/176 · .json · Public domain