Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

463 F. App'x 204

Phillips v. Davis

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided February 2, 2012

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2012-02-02

Relies on District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman · Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.

Decided 2012-02-02

¶1Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

¶2Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

¶3Glenn Phillips and Alice Phillips appeal the district court’s order dismissing this action for want of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Phillips v. Davis, No. 5:11-cv-00107-FPS-JES (N.D.W.Va. Aug. 3, 2011). See D.C. Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413, 44 S.Ct. 149, 68 L.Ed. 362 (1923). We deny the motion for transcript at government expense and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶4AFFIRMED.

/463/fappx/204 · .json · Public domain