United States v. Sharp’s Empirical Analysis
2006
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1029 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663 · 18 U.S.C. § 3663A (§ 204 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 3771 · 21 U.S.C. § 801 (§ 101 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 636 · 42 U.S.C. § 10606
Relies on Harmelin v. Michigan · Hughey v. United States · Babbitt v. Sweet Home Chapter, Communities for Great Ore. · United States v. Burgos · Benjamin v. Brown
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[the movant] is not a victim as that term is used in the CVRA because she is not a person directly and proximately harmed by the federal crime committed by defendant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. In Re Rendon Galvis“there are too many questions left unanswered concerning the link between the Defendant's federal offense and [the petitioner's harm].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrencee.g. In Re Rendon Galvis“[A]ll victims of crime deserve to have their rights protected, whether or not they are the victim of the count charged.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Rendon Galvis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.