Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 463 Mich. 1 - Case v. Consumers Power Co.

Case v. Consumers Power Co.’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
3
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

7 federal appellate · 18 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “all the elements of the plaintiff's claims and should not omit material issues, defenses, or theories if the evidence supports them.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “for the specific profession or specialties at issue. Further, we hold that the error requires reversal because failure to do so would be inconsistent with substantial justice. When the trial judge discussed the jury instructions with the parties, he indicated that he would phrase SJI2d 30.01”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Ordinarily, it is for the jury to determine whether [an actor's] conduct fell below the general standard of care.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.