Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 463 N.W.2d 648 - State v. Lang

State v. Lang’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
July 2007
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Scharffe v. Perkins · Marquez v. Texas · State v. LaGrand · In Interest of JB · State v. Bettenhausen

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"a trial court should determine: whether an irreconcilable conflict exists between counsel and respondent; whether new counsel would be confronted with the same conflict; the timing of the motion; inconvenience to witnesses; the proclivity of the respondent to change counsel; the quality of counsel. Consideration of these factors should guide the trial court's exercise of discretion in deciding whether there is good cause for the request to substitute counsel."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.