Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 463 Pa. 216 - Commonwealth v. Bamber

Commonwealth v. Bamber’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
2
states following
January 1997
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently January 1997 · most notably Commonwealth v. Mangini (1978), Commonwealth v. Pronkoskie (1982)

30 state decisions

140197519801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Commonwealth v. Lee · Argo v. Goodstein · Glendenning v. Sprowls · Commonwealth v. Newkirk

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The trial judge in this case acknowledged through the jury constable that he had received the jury’s message, and told the jury to continue working. We are unable to consider this an intrusion into the jury’s deliberations in any way. Under the circumstances of this case, we find no reversible error.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.