Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 463 Pa. 393 - Commonwealth v. Smith

Commonwealth v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
December 1979
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Mitchell · Commonwealth v. Bosurgi · Commonwealth v. Futch · Government of Virgin Islands v. Gereau · Commonwealth v. Goodwin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““On the record before us, we find no unnecessary delay in appellant’s arraignment which contributed to his confession. Appellant orally confessed within one hour after his arrival at police headquarters and within thirty minutes after his actual questioning began. Since appellant’s oral statement was the same as his written confession, any delay in arraignment after the oral confession would not be prejudicial to appellant, since he had already admitted his participation in the homicides.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.