State v. Huddleston’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
February 1989
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 438 So. 2d 1091 - State v. Johnson · 365 So. 2d 1319 - State v. Marse · State v. Telford · 368 So. 2d 1037 - State v. Clement · 338 So. 2d 678 - State v. Miller
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The state and the defendant shall have the right before argument to submit to the court special written charges for the jury. Such charges may be received by the court in its discretion after argument has begun. A requested special charge shall be given by the court if it does not require qualification, limitation, or explanation, and if it is wholly correct and pertinent.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Saddler
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.