Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 463 So. 2d 1059 - Bailey v. State

463 So. 2d 1059 - Bailey v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
1
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 51 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently April 2015 · most notably 550 So. 2d 406 - Smith v. State (1989), 616 So. 2d 298 - Noe v. State (1993)

1 federal appellate · 51 state decisions

2601985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Strunk v. United States · 419 So. 2d 194 - Clay Bohn Chrysler, Inc. v. Lizana · 383 So. 2d 489 - Turner v. State · 219 So. 2d 673 - New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary v. Lacy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “at the time of a formal indictment or information or else the actual restraints imposed by arrest and holding to a criminal charge.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Lightsey v. State · Polk v. State
  2. “(1) length of delay, (2) the reason for the delay, (3) the defendant's assertion of his right, and (4) prejudice to the defendant.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Polk v. State · 512 So. 2d 868 - Williamson v. State
  3. “[w]here the defendant has not caused the delay and the State does not show good cause for that delay, this Court weighs this factor against the [State]. . . . [A]ny delay unintentionally caused by the State will not be weighed as heavily against the [State] as where the delay was intended to hurt the defendant's case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Murray v. State · 550 So. 2d 406 - Smith v. State

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.