Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 463 SO2D 1270 - State v. Whittaker

State v. Whittaker’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
1
states following
December 2008
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently December 2008 · most notably State v. Lewis (1999), 513 So. 2d 849 - State v. Wiley (1987)

29 state decisions

210198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 445 So. 2d 1203 - State v. Rault · 445 So. 2d 1190 - State v. Davenport · 351 So. 2d 1174 - State v. Elzie · 306 So. 2d 703 - State v. Freeman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “§ 441. Relevant evidence defined: facts admissible Relevant evidence is that tending to show the commission of the offense and the intent, or tending to negative the commission of the offense and the intent. Facts necessary to be known to explain a relevant fact, or which support an inference raised by such fact, are admissible.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, a rational trier of fact could have found defendant guilty of second degree murder. The evidence excludes every reasonable hypothesis of innocence. State v. Whittaker, 463 So.2d 1270, 1273 (La.1985).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Evidence is relevant which makes any fact indicating guilt or innocence more or less probable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.