Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 463 SO2D 237 - Rowls v. Crusoe

Rowls v. Crusoe’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 1985
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 412 So. 2d 5 - Martinez v. Demers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “DO ADMINISTRATIVE ORDERS 84-7 AND 84-20 CONSTITUTE A VALID ASSIGNMENT OF THE NAMED COUNTY JUDGES TO TEMPORARY SERVICE IN THE CIRCUIT COURT PURSUANT TO RULE 2.050(b)(4), FLORIDA RULES OF JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION?”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “DOES ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER 84-7 CONSTITUTE A VALID ASSIGNMENT OF THE NAMED COUNTY JUDGES TO TEMPORARY SERVICE IN THE CIRCUIT COURT PURSUANT TO RULE 2.050(b)(4), FLA.R.JUD.ADMIN.?”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.