Lilly v. Conoco, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1991
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Arceneaux v. Domingue · 428 So. 2d 834 - Stevens v. Allstate Ins. Co. · 425 So. 2d 953 - Cruso v. Greater Lakeside Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“C. A party may not assign as error the giving or the failure to give an instruction unless he objects thereto either before the jury retires to consider its verdict or immediately after the jury retires, stating specifically the matter to which he objects and the grounds of his objection. If he objects prior to the time the jury retires, he shall be given an opportunity to make the objection out of the hearing of the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.