463 So. 2d 372 - Jackson v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently January 2019 · most notably 603 So. 2d 1175 - Standard Jury Instructions-Criminal Cases (1992), 477 So. 2d 985 - The Florida Bar Re: Standard Jury Instructions Criminal Cases (1985)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 436 So. 2d 93 - Combs v. State · 70 Cal. 2d 347 - People v. Curtis · 412 So. 2d 461 - Swartz v. Swartz · Ivester v. State · People v. Stevenson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) It is unlawful for the operator of any vehicle, having knowledge that he has been directed to stop such vehicle by a duly authorized police officer, willfully to refuse or fail to stop such vehicle in compliance with such directive or, having stopped in knowing compliance with such a directive, willfully to flee in an attempt to elude such officer... .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[I]rrespective of the illegality of the initial stop by Wandell, the applicable statute, section 316.1935, Florida Statutes (1983), relating to the offense of fleeing and eluding a police officer, does not require lawfulness of the police action as an element of the offense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“) (emphasis added); Jackson v. State, 463 So.2d 372 , 374 n. 2 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1985) (any excessive force accompanying an arrest may be forcefully defended against”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bradley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.