Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

463 So. 2d 533

463 So.2d 533

10 Fla.L.Weekly 389

Docket No. 84-377.

Sydleman v. Benson

Mary Ann SYDLEMAN, Appellant, v. Daniel W. BENSON, M.D., and Florida Physicians Insurance Reciprocal, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 13, 1985.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1985-02-13

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“Close cases should be resolved in favor of excusing the juror rather than leaving a doubt as to his or her impartiality.”

quoted by 11 later decisions, including 514 So. 2d 426 - Club West v. Tropigas of Florida, Inc., 736 So. 2d 1260 - James v. State

Relies on 419 So. 2d 393 - Diaz v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1985-02-13

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently April 2011 · most notably 538 So. 2d 486 - Price v. State (1989), Williams v. State (1994)

26 state decisions

1101985199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1J. Blayne Jennings of Law Office of J. Blayne Jennings, Gifford, for appellant.

¶2Everett J. VanGaasbeck of Moss, Henderson & Lloyd, Vero Beach, and Marjorie Gadarian Graham of Jones & Foster, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellees.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4We affirm the final judgment and write only to express concern as to the trial court's action in rejecting appellant's challenge for cause of two jurors who had been patients of a physician-expert witness called by the appellee doctor. Upon review of the entire colloquy between the jurors, the judge and the lawyers, we conclude that the judge acted within his discretion in denying the challenge for cause. General Foods Corp. v. Brown,419 So.2d 393 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). However, the impartiality of the finders of fact is an absolute prerequisite to our system of justice. Close cases should be resolved in favor of excusing the juror rather than leaving a doubt as to his or her impartiality.

¶5ANSTEAD, C.J., and DOWNEY and HURLEY, JJ., concur.

/463/so2d/533 · .json · Public domain